Heavy Metals in Cosmetics

Abstract

This analysis examines five heavy metals that are frequently present in cosmetics, exposing a knowledge gap between manufacturers and regulations governing permissible metal concentrations. Cadmium functions as both a colorant and a pollutant, whereas lead and arsenic are recognized as contaminants. Notably, compared to other products, lipsticks, eye shadows, face paints, makeup foundations, and skin-lightening lotions show higher quantities of heavy metals. The results demand that producers and regulators regularly check for these elements in cosmetics. Despite being rare, significant quantities of mercury have been identified in skin-lightening treatments. To investigate the connections between the five metals and find variations among sixteen categories of skin care and cosmetic formulations, a multi-variate meta-analysis was carried out.

Introduction

Cosmetics are products applied to improve appearance without altering body physiology. Although they have evolved from natural formulations to large-scale industrial products, increasing use of petrochemicals and inconsistent regulations have raised safety concerns. A key issue is the presence of heavy metals (such as lead, cadmium, nickel, mercury, and arsenic), which may be intentionally added or introduced as contaminants during manufacturing.

These metals can accumulate in the body through skin contact or oral exposure (e.g., lip products) and may cause both local and systemic toxicity. Health effects include skin irritation, allergic reactions, premature aging, hyperpigmentation, and serious organ damage affecting the nervous system, kidneys, liver, and reproductive system. Prolonged exposure may also contribute to cancer and bioaccumulation due to interference with essential biological processes like enzyme function, DNA/RNA activity, and protein synthesis.

The text reviews major heavy metals in cosmetics, their sources, regulatory limits, and toxic effects. Lead, cadmium, nickel, mercury, and arsenic are commonly found in products like lipsticks, eye makeup, skin-lightening creams, and powders, sometimes exceeding safe limits set by organizations such as the FDA, WHO, and EU. Mercury and lead are particularly concerning due to high toxicity and frequent detection in certain cosmetic categories.

To assess risk, the study uses methods like Margin of Safety (MoS) and systemic exposure dosage (SED), which evaluate potential harm based on exposure levels and toxic thresholds.

Conclusion

In this investigation, different brands of creams, lipsticks, and lip glosses were tested for arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and nickel [5]. The findings showed that the hazardous elements were present in trace amounts [6]. However, it is thought that long-term use of cosmetics tainted with heavy metals could result in the gradual release of these metals into the human body and have negative consequences for the users [7]. Until the issue is sufficiently resolved, widespread usage of such items should be avoided. The overall findings of the health risk assessment and total concentration show that consumers in Botswana are at risk from imported cosmetics [10]. To guarantee that metal concentrations in facial cosmetics do not surpass legal limits, quality control procedures must to be implemented [11].

References

[1] Safavi SO, Najarian RA, RasouliAzad M, Masoumzadeh SH, Ghaderi AM, Eghtesadi RA. A narrative review of heavy metals in cosmetics; health risks. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2019;11:182- 190. DOI: 10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.04.031 [2] Council of the European Union. Council Directive 93/35/EEC of 14 June 1993 amending for the sixth time Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1993;151:33-36 [3] Feldman RJ. Regional variation in percutaneous penetration of 14C cortisol in man. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1967;48:181-183. DOI: 10.1038/jid.1967.29 [4] European Parliament and Council of the European. Directive 2001/83/EC of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2001;L311:67-128 [5] European Parliament and Council of the European. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union. 2009;L342:59209 [6] Roman A, Madras-Majewska B, Popiela-Pleban E. Comparative study of selected toxic elements in propolis and honey. Journal of Apicultural Science. 2011;55(2):97-106 [7] Mohammed FA, Bchitou R, Boulmane M, Bouhaouss A, Guillaume D. Modeling of the distribution of heavy metals and trace elements in argan forest soil and parts of argan tree. Natural Product Communications. 2013;8:21-23. DOI: 10.1177/1934578X1300800105 [8] Brklja?a M, Giljanovi? J, Prki? A. Determination of metals in olive oil by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry: Validation and uncertainty measurements. Analytical Letters. 2013;46:2912-2926. DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2013.814056 [9] La Pera L, Saitta M, Di Bella G, Dugo G. Simultaneous determination of Cd (II), Cu (II), Pb (II), and Zn (II) in citrus essential oils by derivative potentiometric stripping analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51:1125-1129. DOI: 10.1021/jf020804t [10] United States Food and Drug Authorities, FDA’s Testing of Cosmetics for Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead, Mercury, and Nickel Content [Internet] 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/ potential-contaminants-cosmetics/ fdas-testing-cosmeticsarseniccadmium-chromium-cobalt-leadmercury-and-nickel-content [Accessed: December 13, 2021] [11] Health Canada. Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics [Internet] 2012. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/consumer-products [12] Al-Trabulsy HA, Khater AE, Habbani FI. Heavy elements concentrations, physiochemical characteristics and natural radionuclides Heavy Metals - New Insights 14 levels along the Saudi coastline of the Gulf of Aqaba. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2013;6:183-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.10.001 [13] Prasertboonyai, K., et al., Mercury(II) determination in commercial cosmetics and local Thai traditional medicines by flow injection spectrophotometry. Int J Cosmet Sci, 2016. 38(1): p. 68-76. [14] Ahlstrom, M.G., et al., Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis, 2019. [15] Irvine AD, McLean WI, Leung DY. Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365:1315-1327. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1011040 [16] Thyssen, J.P., et al., The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population--prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2007. 57(5): p. 287-99. [17] Sainio EL, Jolanki R, Hakala E, Kanerva L. Metals and arsenic in eye shadows. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42:5-10, DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042001005.x [18] Nielsen, N.H. and T. Menne, Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol, 1992. 72(6): p. 456-60. [19] Torres, F., et al., Management of contact dermatitis due to nickel allergy: an update. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 2009. 2: p. 39-48. [20] Warley MA, Blackledge P, O\'gorman P. Lead poisoning from eye cosmetic. British Medical Journal. 1968;1:117 [21] Fischer, L.A., T. Menne, and J.D. Johansen, Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds--a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 2005. 52(2): p. 57-64. [22] Contado, C. and A. Pagnoni, A new strategy for pressed powder eye shadow analysis: allergenic metal ion content and particle size distribution. Sci Total Environ, 2012. 432: p. 173-9. [23] Al-Saleh, I. and S. Al-Enazi, Trace metals in lipsticks. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 2011. 93(6): p. 1149-1165. [24] Volpe, M., et al., Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmetics from China, Italy, and USA. Microchemical Journal, 2012. 101: p. 65-69. [25] Diepgen, T.L. and E. Weisshaar, Contact dermatitis: epidemiology and frequent sensitizers to cosmetics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2007. 21 Suppl 2: p. 9-13. [26] Le Coz, C.J., et al., Allergic contact dermatitis from shellac in mascara. Contact Dermatitis, 2002. 46(3): p. 149-152. [27] Bruzzoniti, M.C., et al., Chromium, nickel, and cobalt in cosmetic matrices: an integrated bioanalytical characterization through total content, bioaccessibility, and Cr(III)/Cr(VI) speciation. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2017. 409(29): p. 6831-6841. [28] Özkaya E, Mirzoyeva L, Ötkür B. Mercury-induced systemic allergic dermatitis caused by \'white precipitate\' in a skin lightening cream. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60:61-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01460.x [29] Hwang, M., et al., Safety assessment of chromium by exposure from cosmetic products. Arch Pharm Res, 2009. 32(2): p. 235-41. [30] Felter, S.P. and M.L. Dourson, Hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils: options for risk assessment and risk management. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1997. 25(1): p. 43-59. [31] Oyedeji FO, Hassan GO, Adeleke BB. Hydroquinone and heavy metals levels in cosmetics marketed in Nigeria. Trends in Applied Sciences Research. 2011;6:622- 639. DOI: 10.3923/tasr.2011.622.639

Copyright

Copyright © 2026 Samruddhi Kashid, Sudiksha Kalel, Akankasha More, Rajandra Patil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.